This website uses cookies to help improve your user experience
We’re coming to you live from the Smart TV arena. Here is the picture unfolding now: while most eyes are glued to the major operating systems (OS) showing off their setups, Hisense’s V (earlier known as VIDAA) has been steadily climbing the global ranks.
And “steadily” in this case means over 40 million connected devices globally1. V is listed among the fastest-growing TV operating systems and is expected to reach nearly 8% of the global share already in 20292.
It is continuing to broaden its presence across a wide range of TV brands worldwide, reflecting its growing position. Major manufacturers are taking notice: in 2025, European giant Vestel strengthened and formalized its strategic partnership with V (VIDAA)3, following its earlier acquisition of a 4.64% stake in the company.
The platform is extending its reach to hundreds of TV brands worldwide, and even major manufacturers are taking notice: in 2024, European giant Vestel adopted V as a strategic platform and also acquired a 4.64% stake in the company.
Analysts and industry players are signaling strong confidence in V’s trajectory. With its increasing strategic OEM partnerships, investing in data infrastructure, and committing to long-term OS updates, growth appears far from over.
But what is VIDAA OS, and why is it commanding so much attention now in a room full of giants? Now officially known as HomeOS, VIDAA OS is the Smart TV operating system developed by the company formerly known as VIDAA, which rebranded to V in 2026. The change is primarily one of naming: the underlying platform and existing TV experience remain in place. To put it in perspective, imagine the Smart TV market as a vast furniture expo: Samsung, LG, Google, and Roku each unveil collections of high-tech designs, industrial-chic or even eclectic setups. And V, by contrast, takes the IKEA role: practical, easily configurable, and adaptable.
In an industry where saving even 2-3 dollars in hardware costs per unit can translate into millions at scale, V’s lightweight, resource-efficient design delivers a concrete edge. And we have seen it play out in practice.
Which brings us to today’s voice from the field. Alexey Zaberezhniy, Video Solutions System Analyst at Oxagile, has overseen multiple VIDAA OS development projects, including a large-scale deployment for a major European telecom operator.
He joins us to explain the realities behind the headlines: what makes V (VIDAA) distinct, how easy (or not) it is to port applications between systems, and why, in certain cases, “porting is basically a waste of time” compared to building from scratch.
So we switched on the mic, flipped the “ON AIR” light, and asked him the questions everyone wants answered.
Key takeaways:
Let’s break this down:
Independent benchmark tests have ranked VIDAA OS that’s now known as HomeOS among the fastest Smart TV operating systems4, often outperforming competitors in real-world scenarios such as app launches and UI responsiveness. This performance edge strengthens user experience quality, a factor that complements efficiency and contributes directly to adoption.
Another key factor is its efficiency: it’s fast, lightweight, and doesn’t demand high-end hardware. For manufacturers producing millions of units, saving even two or three dollars per device can make a substantial difference. In a market where every cent in the Bill of Materials counts, V’s modest resource requirements give it a clear advantage.
The next important aspect is how apps are delivered. Every application on VIDAA is fully hosted, so if you push a new build to your server, it’s updated for all users instantly. There are no lingering “legacy UI bugs” from missed updates. The process is clean, reliable, and reduces maintenance overhead.
Performance also plays a crucial role. VIDAA (V) handles heavy UI elements with ease, and the OS itself is remarkably responsive. Of course, pushing too much can slow things down, but that reflects the demands of the app, not limitations of the OS.
Taken together, these traits point to something more structural: operational predictability. Its appeal is reliability at scale: stable behavior across hardware tiers, cleaner integration flows, and fewer surprises during deployment. For OEMs and operators, that reduction in execution risk matters as much as cost savings.
All in all, V (VIDAA) is more Prius than sports car: maybe not the flashiest, but it’ll get you further on less gas. And when you’re shipping millions of units, efficiency beats bragging rights every time.
The VIDAA (V) ecosystem is growing fast, and it’s already much bigger than many expect. According to the platform itself, there are over 1,000 apps available globally in the VIDAA App Store. And yes, the big names are there too. Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+, YouTube, and Apple TV+ are available on VIDAA-powered TVs, with availability varying by region and device model. Hulu availability depends more on market support than on universal platform coverage, which gives V credibility in the global streaming space.
But what makes V interesting is how it balances the global and the local. For big markets, it actively onboards regional apps through contracts that often require a local partner or representative. This way, audiences don’t just get the “usual suspects” of streaming. They also see content that feels native to their region.
It’s reasonable to compare VIDAA with Android TV, as both operate as white-label platforms. Like Android, V isn’t exclusive to a single manufacturer: you’ll find it powering Smart TVs from Hisense, Toshiba, and, according to a Vestel/VIDAA partnership announcement, more than 400 brand partners worldwide across over 180 countries.
In that sense, the comparison is valid: they share a similar business model and role in the market. It’s like Uber vs Lyft: same destination, different drivers, and the choice comes down to pricing and performance.
By contrast, Tizen and webOS are closed ecosystems, built only for Samsung and LG hardware respectively. So architecturally and from a market perspective, only V (ex VIDAA) and Android TV are comparable: broad OEM adoption with differing technical trade-offs and resource requirements.
But whichever Smart TV platforms you’re targeting, understanding device-specific constraints is still critical for smooth, reliable app performance.
When you actually sit down and build for V (earlier known as VIDAA TV OS), a few things immediately stand out.
Taken together, these traits define V (VIDAA) as a platform that’s lean and efficient, though still maturing.
We map out every screw, circuit, and hidden corner of V or VIDAA OS development, so your app lands perfectly on every device and runs without compromise.
When the source app is a true Smart TV app (modular, remote-first, and well-structured) the migration is relatively straightforward, about 3/10 in difficulty. Modular code and TV-optimized UX allow significant reuse, reducing effort and risk.
Common areas requiring attention include:
Generally, experienced teams can handle these issues on their own. Exploring HomeOS (or VIDAA OS) features in multiple projects, we’ve found that a clean, well-structured codebase and familiarity with Smart TV environments usually make vendor escalation unnecessary. Moreover, drawing on our hands-on experience in Smart TV app development and custom streaming platforms, we can anticipate any potential challenges or bottlenecks before they even arise.
A major European telecom operator required a feature-rich OTT/TV solution across multiple platforms for millions of users.
Oxagile’s approach:
The result was a robust multi-screen application with fast deployment and hosted updates, stable, scalable performance across millions of concurrent users, increased user engagement, and reduced churn thanks to consistent multi-screen experience.
Thoughtful architecture and platform-aware frontend design enable maintainable, high-performance OTT applications across diverse devices.
Porting a traditional web app to a Smart TV is technically possible, but it’s often inefficient. Web apps are designed for mouse or touch input, whereas TVs rely on remote navigation. Dense layouts can become unreadable from a typical viewing distance, and navigation patterns like infinite scroll, hover states, or nested menus usually need to be rethought. Performance is another concern, as Smart TVs have limited memory and CPU, so inefficient code quickly becomes noticeable.
I generally recommend starting with a thorough technical and UX audit. If this shows that the app would require major redesigns, it’s often more efficient and cost-effective to build a native Smart TV app from scratch rather than try to adapt the existing web version.
If the app is already built for Smart TVs, porting it is often the best approach since much of the UI and underlying logic can be reused. But if the app was originally designed for web, the effort to adapt it (UX redesign, input handling, performance tuning) can end up costing more than building a new native app from scratch. The first step should always be a detailed audit to determine what’s truly required.
Learn about Oxagile’s multi-screen approach that allows to cut costs on Smart TV development, including V (VIDAA).
It performs well out of the box, but developers still need to be mindful of resource use.
Keep the DOM and rendering layers lean, limit heavy animations and complex gradients, and make sure the app explicitly detects and adjusts for 720p versus 1080p screens. It’s also important to profile memory and CPU usage on target devices, including older models, and design navigation with the remote in mind to minimize input lag.
Following these steps will help your app run smoothly and reliably, on par with other platforms in the same hardware class.
The secret is automation. By using deployment and packaging scripts, you cut down on repetitive manual work and make it much easier (and more cost-effective) to support multiple projects.
Basically, the smarter your tools and the more experience your team has, the smoother everything runs.
The review process is generally straightforward and efficient. All apps that follow best practices, are thoroughly tested, and maintain high code quality usually get approved within about two weeks.
Of course, there are always nuances to consider, but our direct project experience shows that teams with hands-on expertise in custom streaming app development, porting web apps to Smart TVs, and mastering TV-specific UX usually navigate the process with ease. So in our cases, clean, well-structured code has consistently been enough to secure fast and seamless approval.
V does not specify a single support period for every HomeOS device. Its current policy provides at least five years of security updates from a device model’s launch date, with some models supported for longer. Broader HomeOS support depends on the device’s hardware capabilities and the platform’s development.
Here it really depends on whether the development is done in-house or outsourced. For operators, if they hand the work to a vendor, most of these details are abstracted away, and what matters to them is cost, speed, and reliability of delivery. But for development teams, there are a few technical points to keep in mind.
Success with V, or VIDAA OS Smart TV, starts with a structured approach.
Following these steps makes development or migration predictable, efficient, and commercially rewarding.
V is clearly on the rise. It’s lightweight, fast, and efficient, with a hosted-app model that delivers updates to every user instantly.
That said, building for Smart TVs always comes with its own set of challenges. Limited memory and hardware constraints mean that a careless approach simply won’t do. Expertise, careful planning, and a disciplined development process are essential.
When it comes to Smart TV projects, teams need to consider several scenarios:
Regardless of the starting point or platform, be it V (VIDAA Smart OS), Android TV, or others, the key lies in understanding device-specific constraints and implementing thoughtful architecture that supports performance, scalability, and a cohesive user experience.
For teams operating across multiple screens, success depends on understanding the peculiarities of each platform. Input methods, screen resolutions, and interaction patterns differ across devices, and careful architecture is required to maintain brand consistency and functional parity.
Planning for these differences early in development not only ensures visually polished applications but also strengthens reliability and performance. This multi-screen approach, which can be seen in platform-aware application strategies, makes one thing clear: thoughtful design allows the same product to perform seamlessly across TVs, mobile devices, and web interfaces.
In short, success with V (VIDAA) projects is achieved by combining deep platform awareness, structured development practices, and iterative testing, creating applications that are efficient and adaptable.
Oxagile’s team can help with development on V/VIDAA from scratch or with migration from an existing solution without unnecessary complexity.
1. VIDAA surpasses 40 million connected devices globally as Nexxen extends $35 million partnership — Investing.com
2. Omdia highlights strong shipment growth for VIDAA in key markets such as North America — Omdia Press Release
3. VIDAA is chosen by Vestel as one of its strategic platforms with Vestel acquiring a 4.64% stake in the company — PR Newswire
4. VIDAA named one of the fastest Smart TV operating systems in independent performance benchmarks — MyBroadband
After Hisense’s rebranding, VIDAA is now called V or V Home, while the operating system, VIDAA OS, is officially named HomeOS. It’s a Smart TV operating system developed by Hisense and designed to run on a wide range of devices from multiple manufacturers. Systems like Samsung’s Tizen or LG’s webOS are mostly platform-specific. By contrast, VIDAA Smart OS, or HomeOS, is a white-label solution that supports rapid deployment, lightweight performance, and a fully hosted application model. This allows apps to be updated instantly for all users, simplifying maintenance and reducing legacy-version issues.
Yes, provided the architecture is designed thoughtfully from the start. VIDAA’s lightweight core and hosted app model make it suitable for high-volume rollouts, but scalability depends on implementation discipline.
Key success factors include:
Thus, the latest VIDAA OS version features can reliably support deployments reaching millions of users, particularly in telecom and operator-driven environments.
According to the V (VIDAA OS) overview from the perspective of Oxagile’s expert and practical experience, the system delivers fast, responsive performance, even on lower-end hardware. Its lightweight architecture makes it less demanding on memory and CPU, which is especially valuable for large-scale deployments.
Applications designed with modular, remote-first architecture run reliably, while hosted apps ensure seamless updates across millions of devices. Minor adjustments may be needed for rendering gradients, transparency, or resolution handling, but overall, the platform provides a stable and predictable environment for developers and operators alike.
HomeOS (ex VIDAA OS) offers a balance of speed, resource efficiency, and cross-device cross-device compatibility.
The V, or VIDAA OS TV platform, may not have the brand cachet of Tizen or webOS, but its flexibility and lightweight nature make it well-suited for mass-market devices and multi-screen ecosystems. For developers, its hosted app model, straightforward deployment, and SDK support provide a reliable foundation for creating high-quality, scalable applications.
Before committing to development or migration, teams should conduct a structured technical and UX audit. V (VIDAA) is efficient, but Smart TV constraints require deliberate planning.
Core evaluation areas include:
A clear assessment at this stage prevents costly redesigns later and keeps the platform choice aligned with both technical and commercial objectives.
