In lockstep with your business

Any software development cooperation models can be adapted to your immediate commercial goals. You get pure execution where it matters most: an instant operational upgrade, a surgical injection of expertise, or full-cycle development from the ground up.

Choose your engagement model scenario

Scenario A

“We have a short-to-mid-term initiative with a hard-capped budget, and we want to hand over full execution responsibility to a partner who can take it completely turnkey under a fixed scope and fixed bid.”
The best fit: Project-based delivery
  • Phase-driven flow: a sequential lifecycle, from inception to stabilization and transition
  • Front-loading elaboration: business context analysis, stakeholder prioritization, and requirements management
  • Architecture blueprinting: initial domain models evolving into formal software specifications
  • Milestone-based handovers: transparent progress via regular status reports and live demos
  • Fixed commercial baseline: milestone-triggered billing based on predefined scope, quality, and schedule

Scenario B

“Our product roadmap is fluid and requirements will change, so we need a scalable team of developers that can seamlessly integrate into our multi-stakeholder setup and maintain a strictly predictable, high-cadence development pace”
The best fit: Managed dedicated teams
  • DOR and DOD enforcement: sprints launch only when enough definition of ready compliant user stories are finalized to feed sprint 1, and close upon meeting definition of done specifications
  • Continuous data-driven reporting: real-time visibility through 27 project and progress metrics, team velocity analysis tracking 15+ factors, and a proprietary estimated billing and delivery date report
  • FTE commercial model: commercial structures operate on predictable monthly team-based pricing, with transparent tracking of overtime or onsite expenses

Engagement formats for targeted resource demands

Tailored solutions

Ideal in case the production demands have shifted to on-demand stream of ad-hoc maintenance, quick fixes, or minor optimizations.

What it includes:

  • Metered billing
    Financial outlays match actual engineering hours logged, providing total budget clarity.
  • Frictionless pivoting
    The flexibility to redirect resources to immediate technical priorities without procurement bottlenecks.

Team augmentation

Ideal in case tight launch windows or localized talent gaps threaten delivery, and you need specialized muscle inside your core team.

What it includes:

  • Direct repository integration
    Vetted engineers commit directly to your active branches, aligning with your engineering culture.
  • Operational sovereignty
    An unmanaged setup leaving task assignment, daily oversight, and architectural control in your hands.

What part of your process needs a second set of eyes?

Over 70% of Oxagile’s engineers are senior-level professionals. Count on experienced solution architects and technical experts to bring immediate tactical clarity to code-level challenges, roadmap validation, and risk identification in high-stakes deployments.

Preempt costly bottlenecks with precision consulting or auditing across complex online video ecosystems, AdTech initiatives, fintech pipelines, AI integrations, data-driven workflows, and more.

What is your preferred approach to our collaboration?

We don’t force your project into a box of fixed project pricing models. You can pick the absolute predictability of a traditional blueprint, the tight loop of rapid agile sprints, or heavy-duty enterprise governance. Our delivery architecture conforms to your operational reality, not the other way around.

Waterfall

A sequential, phase-driven process, where testing starts only after coding is completed.

Best for short- and mid-term projects requiring superior budget control.

Delivers high stakeholder visibility through formal SAD, SRS, and master test plans.

Scrum

An iterative framework where both coding and testing are executed in parallel.

Great for a quick project start, early value delivery, and total flexibility to pivot project scope at any stage.

Initiates with a structured Sprint 0 to deliver a project wiki and design architecture.

Agile at scale

Tailored for complex, multi-stakeholder enterprise portfolios.

Backed by extensive reporting, overarching product quality management, and regular audits.

Project scalability is underpinned by dedicated in-house Centers of Excellence for R&D, PMO, and talent management.

FAQ

Which engagement model is best if my project requirements are not fully defined yet?

“Time and materials” or a “Managed team” models work best because both allow the scope to change as requirements become clearer during development, unlike “Fixed price” which needs a fully defined scope upfront.

What is the difference between Managed service, Fixed price, Time and materials, and Team augmentation?
  • Managed service: The vendor takes responsibility for delivery and handles team coordination and the overall development process.
  • Fixed price: The scope, timeline, and total cost are agreed before the project starts and remain fixed unless formally changed.
  • Time and materials: You are billed for the actual effort spent, while the scope stays flexible and can evolve during the project.
  • Team augmentation: External specialists join your existing team and work under your direct management as part of your internal setup.
Can we combine different engagement models during one project?

Models are often combined, for example starting with Time and materials for discovery, then moving into Fixed price or Managed development, or mixing a Managed team with additional specialists from Team augmentation.

Can we start with a discovery or elaboration phase before full-scale development?

A discovery phase is commonly used first to define requirements, architecture, and risks, and then it is followed by the most suitable delivery model based on what has been clarified.

Find the right-fit engagement model

Share your current roadmap, and we will create a non-binding engagement model blueprint that syncs with your operational reality, delivery cadence, and growth priorities.

Command your format